On Thu, 2014-12-25 at 12:54 -0500, Roger Pushor wrote: > Hello > > > > I'm working with Centos 6.5 - 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64 and yum version: > > > > 3.2.29 > > Installed: rpm-4.8.0-38.el6_6.x86_64 at 2014-12-25 08:21 > Built : CentOS BuildSystem <http://bugs.centos.org> at 2014-12-09 18:24 > Committed: Florian Festi <ffe...@redhat.com> at 2014-11-13 > > Installed: yum-3.2.29-60.el6.centos.noarch at 2014-12-25 08:21 > Built : CentOS BuildSystem <http://bugs.centos.org> at 2014-10-16 15:15 > Committed: Johnny Hughes <joh...@centos.org> at 2014-10-15 [...] > > When I do a yum history I get this: > > > > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security > > ID | Login user | Date and time | Action(s) | > Altered > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > > 29 | root <root> | 2014-12-25 03:19 | E, I, O, U | 344 > EE [...] > > Which seems to indicate the last yum update failed which it did - I was > running it via ssh and it got to the point where is said "Is this ok [y/N]:" > and lost my connection with the server before I could respond "y" or "n"
That wouldn't affect history/etc. ... something else must have gone wrong. If yum dies before it prints "starting transaction" it's completely harmless. > When I do yum history undo 29 I get: CentOS doesn't keep old packages, so downgrades will often not work. > Which would indicate to me yum thinks it installed > kernel-2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64 however when I do uname -r I get > 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64 What does "yum list kernel" say? > None of the updates got applied, I just used the kernel as the example > because it was the easiest example I could find. You can try one of (in a rough order of preference): yum distro-sync full yum history redo reinstall remove 29 yum reinstall '*' yum-complete-transaction _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
