On 11/29/08 10:47 AM, Malthe Borch wrote:
> I've also corrected a benchmark comparing performance between
> preparing Chameleon and ZPT for rendering (e.g. parsing/compilation
> steps). Chameleon is still quite slow on a cold boot (30 times
> slower), but when the cache is used (e.g. "warm boot"), there's only a
> factor of 1.25 to differ.

How do I interpret that? Is chameleon only 1.25 faster than zpt when 
rendering, or is there a compile penalty at every render?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"z3c.pt" group.
To post to this group, send email to z3c_pt@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to