Note: Beware! Default reply-to is to the list.

Hello, 

I sought deeper and found the answer to this today in the perl POD
Document perlmod. See below.


On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:32:16 +0200
Anne Wainwright <anothera...@fables.co.za> wrote:

> Note: Beware! Default reply-to is to the list.
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> (Edoardo, how are you doing with Mojolicious. I had a quick look at
> the site today only, but I could find nothing on Dancer).
> 
> Is there anyone out there working throught the Diment & Trout
> DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO CATALYST book? My query comes from there but is a
> query in principle.
> 
> If I have a working .pl file (LolCatalyst/Lite/Translator.pm) and can
> succesfully run tests on my app to date thus : $ prove -lv t/ ,
> then ...
> 
> If I take a subroutine from the working .pl file and place it in
> another .pm file (LolCatalyst/Lite/Translator/LOLCAT.pm) in a lower
> level dedicated directory, and then add in to the initial .pl file a
> 'use' thus:
> 
> use LolCatalyst::Lite::Translator::LOLCAT;
> 
> should the tests still run. ie. should the use line refer the
> subroutine request to the original .pm file down to the new one if
> the sub is no longer in the original .pm file?

<quote perlmod>

For example, to start a traditional, non-OO module called Some::Module,
create a file called Some/Module.pm ........

......
......

...... any double colons in the module name, such as Some::Module, are
translated into your system's directory separator, usually "/". 

<end quote perlmod>

thus the module Module.pm in the POD example is located in /Some

so my assumptions were correct,
so any error is not a matter of module name and placement
so I can stop wasting time and look elsewhere.

as they say, rtfm!

bestest
Anne


> 
> we are having trouble here!
> 
> thanks in advance
> Anne
> 
> 
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:48:22 +0100
> Edoardo Sabadelli <edoardo.sabade...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Note: Beware! Default reply-to is to the list.
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Anne Wainwright
> > <anothera...@fables.co.za> wrote:
> > > Note: Beware! Default reply-to is to the list.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello, Ewald,
> > >
> > > Welcome!
> > >
> > > I have not got far, but am slowly building  web app using Catalyst
> > > which is the Perl answer to all other patent web production
> > > systems. I am looking for some quality time over the Xmas recess
> > > here to move forward a bit faster.
> > 
> > I suggest to have a look also at the alternatives to Catalyst, like
> > Dancer and Mojolicious.
> > 
> > For small applications they are very interesting: easier to use and
> > much more lightweight than Catalyst, from which they borrow a lot of
> > concepts.
> > 
> > I'm currently trying out Mojolicious for the rewrite of my personal
> > site and I like it.
> > 
> > Ciao!
> _______________________________________________
> Za-pm mailing list
> Za-pm@pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/za-pm
> 
> posts also archived on Mail Archive
> http://www.mail-archive.com/za-pm@pm.org/
_______________________________________________
Za-pm mailing list
Za-pm@pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/za-pm

posts also archived on Mail Archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/za-pm@pm.org/

Reply via email to