Note: Beware! Default reply-to is to the list.
Hi, with a new machine I am aiming to get a bugfree cpan and catalyst installation this time around. (more care needed, also more knowledge available to me than previously) I did have a local installation previously but ... (lots of them). So, the Catalyst book (Diment et al. THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO ... ) recommends installing local::lib through cpan, thus. $ cpan cpan> install local::lib nothing wrong with that, I take it, except that this is not as discussed in local::lib documentation, or on this link (which looks the same) - basically download the tarball, unzip, then the whole make procedure. http://perl.jonallen.info/writing/articles/install-perl-modules-without-root what are the implications of the two methods, or will they both result in identical installations. I await comment before committing myself at the prompt. Thanks for input. Anne _______________________________________________ Za-pm mailing list Zaemail@example.com http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/za-pm posts also archived on Mail Archive http://firstname.lastname@example.org/