EDITORIAL: Al Qaeda strikes in Lahore...

The Sri Lankan cricket team playing in Lahore was attacked Tuesday morning by 
terrorists, injuring three team members and killing seven police personnel 
guarding the team. Twelve terrorists arrived in rickshaws, took positions, 
surrounded the van bringing the Sri Lankans to Gaddafi Stadium, fired on it for 
25 minutes and then made good their escape. They were armed with rockets, hand 
grenades and kalashnikovs. The attack was caught on camera and shown by the TV 
channels in the morning. The cricket series has been called off and the Sri 
Lankans have gone home, shaken by what they have gone through.

Governor Salmaan Taseer, who arrived on the scene, stated that the attack was 
carried out by the same people who had executed the Mumbai attacks last year. 
That attack was traced to members of Lashkar-e Tayba or Jama'at-ud Dawa, some 
of whose planners are being investigated. On the day the attack on the cricket 
team in Lahore occurred, the newspapers carried news that Al Qaeda had owned up 
the Marriott Hotel blast of September 2008 in a message sent to the Saudi 
embassy in Islamabad. On December 22, 2008, the adviser to the Prime Minister 
on Interior, Mr Rehman Malik, had told the National Assembly that the Marriott 
blast was carried out by Lashkar-e Jhangvi.

In her interviews before she was assassinated, Ms Benazir Bhutto had revealed 
that the attack on her procession in Karachi in October 2007 was carried out by 
the gang of "Abdul Rehman Sindhi, an Al Qaeda-linked Lashkar-e Jhangvi (LeJ) 
militant from the Dadu district of Sindh". After her assassination in December 
2008, an Al Qaeda spokesman claimed having killed "an American asset". The LeJ 
is a sectarian outfit, created in 1996, and trained by Al Qaeda in its camps in 
Afghanistan. In the late 1990s, whenever the government of Pakistan demanded 
the handover of LeJ killers, the Taliban government, backed by Al Qaeda, 
steadily refused the demand.

There are other signs that the LeJ is an ally of Al Qaeda. The record of 
Lashkar-e Jhangvi as the policy instrument of Al Qaeda is quite impressive. 
Today it is one of a number of erstwhile jihadi militias aligned with Al Qaeda 
in their war against Pakistan. In May 2002, a New Zealand cricket team 
abandoned its tour of Pakistan after an LeJ suicide bomber attacked them in 
front of their hotel in Karachi.

LeJ was closely aligned with Khalid Sheikh Muhammad, the master-planner of the 
9/11 attacks in the United States. When the British national Omar Sheikh, 
sprung from an Indian jail by Jaish-e Muhammad after the hijack of an Indian 
airliner in 1999, led the American journalist Daniel Pearl into a trap in 
Karachi in January 2002, the trap was actually a group of terrorists of LeJ who 
finally facilitated Khalid Sheikh Muhammad in personally slaughtering Pearl in 
a safe house belonging to a charity trust linked to a madrassa in Karachi and 
active in Afghanistan, and banned as a terrorist organisation.

The latest Lahore attack was not a suicide-bombing which usually indicates 
circumstances of reduced possibilities for the terrorists; it was an operation 
where the terrorists saw an open-space opportunity where a drilled squad of 
terrorists could accomplish the mission. The Sri Lankan team's logistics was 
studied and a place was chosen where their van could be intercepted. The police 
preparation for the team's security obviously did not include a set-piece 
battle where a travelling row of vehicles could actually be stopped with 
rocket-launchers and grenades, allowing the killers to fire directly into the 
van. What they had in mind was probably the kind of unsuccessful attack 
suffered by President Pervez Musharraf in Rawalpindi in 2003.

Despite many occasions when Al Qaeda has owned up its attacks in Pakistan - one 
was when an Al Qaeda spokesman declared that the Danish embassy in Islamabad 
was attacked by an Al Qaeda suicide-bomber - few Pakistanis believe that Al 
Qaeda is dangerous for Pakistan. In a number of TV discussions, educated 
audiences have expressed the verdict that either Al Qaeda does not exist or it 
does not represent any danger to Pakistan. This trend is strengthened by 
so-called "careful" reporting from places where journalists like Musa Khankhel 
of Swat are exposed to the danger of being killed. It is also strengthened by 
the regular acquittal of LeJ terrorists from courts where judges are not 
protected by the state. *

SECOND EDITORIAL: ...and effect on national politics

An even more dangerous trend is of recent birth. On February 23, 2009, "under 
instructions" from Mullah Umar and "sheikh" Osama bin Laden, the three feuding 
warlords of Waziristan - Baitullah Mehsud, Maulvi Nazir and Hafiz Gul Bahadur - 
announced reconciliation and merger under the rubric of Shura Ittehad 
Mujahideen (SIM). They also issued a pamphlet that vowed the targeting of Al 
Qaeda's three enemies: "Obama, Zardari and Karzai". Baitullah Mehsud's 
Tehreek-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) subsequently announced that it would no longer 
fight the Pakistan army. But the announcement of "Zardari" as a target while 
letting the Pakistan army off the hook is a menacing signal for Pakistani 

International cricket is no longer possible in Pakistan; therefore we should 
stop accusing foreign teams of discriminating against Pakistan vis-à-vis India. 
The question here is of the survival of Pakistan, not of cricket. The country 
is split down the middle, its two mainstream parties getting ready to face each 
other in the streets amid rising violence. The politicians and other civil 
society organisations protesting against the government have so far enjoyed the 
"exemption" from terrorism allowed by Al Qaeda. Unfortunately, it seems they 
are not going to give up confrontation to unite against Al Qaeda.

Al Qaeda is hardly interested in the restoration of the deposed judges or the 
correct observance of democratic rules in Pakistan. It wants Pakistan as its 
own state, armed with nuclear weapons and an economy that can sustain global 
terrorism. It would be a pity if Pakistan responds, like an ex-ISI boss who has 
already done so, by accusing India's RAW or Israel's Mossad for this attack, as 
some commentators did in reference to the Marriott blast when an Indo-Pak media 
war was sparked by the Mumbai attacks. *

Home | Editorial 

Kirim email ke