Evolution fine but no apology to Darwin: Vatican
Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:07pm EDT
By Philip Pullella
VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - The Vatican said on Tuesday the theory of
evolution was compatible with the Bible but planned no posthumous
apology to Charles Darwin for the cold reception it gave him 150 years
Archbishop Gianfranco Ravasi, the Vatican's culture minister, was
speaking at the announcement of a Rome conference of scientists,
theologians and philosophers to be held next March marking the 150th
anniversary of the publication of Darwin's "The Origin of Species".
Christian churches were long hostile to Darwin because his theory conflicted 
with the literal biblical account of creation.
Earlier this week a leading Anglican churchman, Rev. Malcolm Brown,
said the Church of England owed Darwin an apology for the way his ideas
were received by Anglicans in Britain.
Pope Pius XII described evolution as a valid scientific approach to
the development of humans in 1950 and Pope John Paul reiterated that in
1996. But Ravasi said the Vatican had no intention of apologizing for
earlier negative views.
"Maybe we should abandon the idea of issuing apologies as if history
was a court eternally in session," he said, adding that Darwin's
theories were "never condemned by the Catholic Church nor was his book
ever banned".
Creationism is the belief that God created the world in six days as
described in the Bible. The Catholic Church does not read the Genesis
account of creation literally, saying it is an allegory for the way God
created the world.
Some other Christians, mostly conservative Protestants in the United
States, read Genesis literally and object to evolution being taught in
biology class in public high schools.
Sarah Palin, the Republican candidate for the U.S. vice presidency,
said in 2006 that she supported teaching both creationism and evolution
in schools but has subsequently said creationism does not have to be
part of curriculum.
The Catholic Church teaches "theistic evolution," a stand that
accepts evolution as a scientific theory and sees no reason why God
could not have used a natural evolutionary process in the forming of
the human species.
It objects to using evolution as the basis for an atheist philosophy
that denies God's existence or any divine role in creation. It also
objects to using Genesis as a scientific text.
As Ravasi put it, creationism belongs to the "strictly theological sphere" and 
could not be used "ideologically in science."
Professor Philip Sloan of Notre Dame University, which is jointly
holding next year's conference with Rome's Pontifical Gregorian
University, said the gathering would be an important contribution to
explaining the Catholic stand on evolution.
"In the United States, and now elsewhere, we have an ongoing public
debate over evolution that has social, political and religious
dimensions," he said.
"Most of this debate has been taking place without a strong Catholic
theological presence, and the discussion has suffered accordingly," he
Pope Benedict discussed these issues with his former doctoral
students at their annual meeting in 2006. In a speech in Paris last
week, he spoke out against biblical literalism.
(Additional reporting by Tom Heneghan in Paris and Patsy Wilson in Washington; 
editing by Robert Hart)
© Thomson Reuters 2008. All rights reserved. ---------------
Jusfiq Hadjar gelar Sutan Maradjo Lelo

Allah yang disembah orang Islam tipikal dan yang digambarkan oleh al-Mushaf itu 
dungu, buas, kejam, keji, ganas, zalim lagi biadab hanyalah Allah fiktif.


Kirim email ke