On 2013-02-09 11:44:04, Ignas Anikevičius wrote: > On 08/02/13 08:14:55 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2013-02-08 19:04:41, Ignas Anikevičius wrote: > > > Just checked it, only glib 2.32 onwards is supported according to the > > > README . So is the if block really necessary? The same is for > > > master.  > > > > Neither the code nor the build system enforce glib >= 2.32. I'm not > > going to break compatibility with older glib versions just because of a > > call to a deprecated function that's a no-op in newer versions of glib. > > > > Regards > > -- > > Sebastian Ramacher > > Don't get me wrong, I also think, that it would be silly to break it > because of only one call, but maybe the README file should be updated, > so that people know what is the _lowest_ supported version. > > Also, as you can see on the glib docs , the muttex changes, which I > have done also are for glib >=2.32. I do not know though if zathura > breaks with earlier versions of glib, but, for example, g_mutex_init() > function is not present in glib versions prior to 2.32. > > Also, there were some changes to render.c file previously by Moritz , > which also change the mutex stuff in a similar way. There would be less > confusion if there is no check for glib 2.31 and people with old glib > versions (2.32 was tagged about 11 months ago ) shouldn't use zathura > development version either way. > > However, I will respect any decision you take, but as far as I can see, > having a check for glib 2.31 together with some other code in render.c > and page-widget.c is rather strange.
Great, so we broke support for FreeBSD (which has glib 2.28 if my google-foo is correct). I'll add workarounds later. Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ zathura mailing list email@example.com http://lists.pwmt.org/mailman/listinfo/zathura