--- In [email protected], "Bob Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Haha, finally somebody new voted with a new opinion! :) > > ~ Bob
I did it :P I just can't believe that it's possible to solve ZBLL fast enough. Because OLL+PLL can be done in 5-6 seconds, and ZBF2L is approximately 1 second slower than F2L, ZBLL has to be done faster than 4-5 seconds. And even if you average 3-4 seconds for ZBLL, it's only a second faster than Fridrich, and you have spent many years just to achieve that one second. I think it would be better to just practice Fridrich or other "normal" methods and I'm sure that your average times will drop more than one second in 2-3 years :) Anyway, this is just what I think, maybe you can some day prove that I am wrong :) I'll wait and see :) - Johannes (sorry my bad English...) ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/MXMplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/zbmethod/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
