+1 I agree completely with you
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Markus Korn <thek...@gmx.de> wrote:
> I thought about this bug a bit last night, and I think I changed my mind a
> 1.) yes, we should remove the python datahub from lp:zeitgeist entirely
> 2.) no, we should not do it ASAP, we should wait for it until ubuntu
> maverick got released. Two reasons for this: a.) I doubt the vala datahub
> will make it into maverick (they are in a frozen freeze right now), b.) I
> don't want to maintain two versions of the same software at the same time.
> This makes this bug a first target for a 0.6 release we could try to publish
> somewhere at the end of october.
> 3.) with this change we should remove the '--no-datahub' switch of the
> daemon and replace it by '--use-datahub </path/to/datahub>'
> Replace old datahub with vala port
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> Status in Zeitgeist Framework: New
> Status in Zeitgeist Datahub: New
> Bug description:
> Now with mhr3's vala datahub port, I think we should get rid of the python
> version ASAP.
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
This is me doing some advertisement for my blog http://seilo.geekyogre.com
Replace old datahub with vala port
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
Status in Zeitgeist Framework: New
Status in Zeitgeist Datahub: New
Now with mhr3's vala datahub port, I think we should get rid of the python
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zeitgeist
Post to : email@example.com
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zeitgeist
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp