On 5 January 2011 15:43, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 January 2011 12:38, Michal Hruby <michal....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> file:///home/mikkel/myproject/trunk#27 >> >> This is a perfectly valid file (directory) name, with one little problem >> that it doesn't exist. > > This is *not* a file name. It is a URI. Let's keep the terminology > correct here. It has path member being /home/mikkel/myproject/trunk > and has a URI fragment of 27. Please see > http://labs.apache.org/webarch/uri/rfc/rfc3986.html#components. > > Fragments should be definition point to some resource inside the > resource specified by the path element. If we consider the path > element as a bzr repo, and not just a file, then I think that a revno > fragment is perfectly reasonable.
BTW - and if an app instructed to open file:///foo.txt#27 fails with "Can not open /foo.txt#27. No such file or directory." Then that's a bug in the app. Because the fragment should not be taken into account when resolving the path. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zeitgeist Post to : email@example.com Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zeitgeist More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp