** Changed in: zeitgeist
Milestone: None => 0.8.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist
Framework Team, which is subscribed to Zeitgeist Framework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639737
Title:
Improve insertion times
Status in Zeitgeist Framework:
In Progress
Bug description:
We insert pretty slowly with an average of 0.15 seconds for one event
on my core i5 2.5 GHz beast.
RainCT had some optimization possibilities:
1) PRAGMA synchronous=OFF
2) PRAGMA journal_mode=OFF
The Chat:
------------------------------------------------------------
<kamstrup> I think we are - but I can't recall... in case of failed
transactions - but I don't even know if we use transactions these days...
<seif> <RainCT> try synchronous=OFF
<seif> <RainCT> but it can corrupt your database if your phone dies while ZG
is inserting
<seif> <RainCT> and journal_mode=MEMORY
<seif> <RainCT> or OFF since we don't use rollback anyway
<seif> so maybe journal_mode = OFF is a good start?
<kamstrup> okay, he's probably right...
<kamstrup> 'grep -Ri rollback _zeitgeist/' is your friend :-)
<kamstrup> apparently we are not using rollback...
More info can be found here: http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html
------------------------------------------------------------
In order to get a better picture of what's going on, can you please try to
get some more information, like:
1) How many events are in your database?
2) What's the insertion time for one event into an empty db?
3) Out of this 0.15 secs, how many time is spend in our python code, and
what's the time of the actual sql action?
4) How much faster is adding 10 events at once compared to adding them one at
a time?
5) You think 0.15 secs is slow for inserting one event, what time do you
expect, and why?
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zeitgeist
Post to : zeitgeist@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zeitgeist
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
