The way the question is phrased raises two problems.  "Can" implies a 
choice, which we have when it comes to feelings regarding 
our "enemies".  That means we can be selective if we decide "this 
enemy" isn't so bad but "that enemy" is not worhty of our love.  
Making it a statement "Love your enemies" removes the option.
   "We" forms the real crux of the problem.  I have no control over 
anyone beyond myself, so saying what "we" can or should do will always 
lead to the frustration expressed about "other religious leaders".  
Pat Robertson speaks only for Pat Roberstson when he calls for 
assassinations or proclaims God's judgment through the physical ills 
or natural disasters experienced by others.  He betrays the values he 
claims to follow by such statements, but there is little I can do to 
make the "we" of Pat and I agree to "love our enemies".


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today! 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to