It's seeing through the sense that there is some "I" who detaches or 
embraces that makes all the difference. 
Ian

> No Cause.  No Effect.  Just This.
> 
> --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, donald hwong 
> <donaldhwong@> wrote:
> >
> > Tony,
> > 
> > As always, they are one of the same.  There is no duality. 
> Detachment is to embrace life. 
> > 
> > This detachment is to detach from illusions and false forms, 
seeing 
> the true nature of things in order to enjoy life.
> > 
> > Sixth Patriarch said, "Nothing ever occurred. No need to bear 
the 
> suffering."
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Tony <actionheroes@> wrote:                                   
> <donaldhwong> Absolute dettachment is based on seeing the true 
> nature 
> >  of phenomenons and not attitude adjustment.
> >  > 
> >  
> >  Yet Zen is not about detachment but embracing life?
> >  




Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today! 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to