Buddhism, as far as I know, in all of its many forms, does not believe in a
supreme being or a soul.


I think that blind luck and evolution is as good of an explanation for
everything as anything. 


Evolution is not an act of faith. It is an act of observation. It’s story is
told in the fossil record and your RNA and DNA.

You ask, “Isn’t the belief in no intelligent higher power also a religion?”

I can only say that not believing in something for which there is no
evidence is not religion.








From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Al
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 4:58 PM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Dear Bill


From: Chuck Gierhart When you ask this question about a blade of grass, the
Pacific Ocean or a rock, no answer is possible. You can describe how these
things interact with their environment or the benefit we derive from them
but thatâ?Ts not the same as a purpose. To ask what purpose these things
have is a loaded question. The question itself implies that a supreme being
create them for a purpose.>

So you think that Zen is Atheism? That everything is a product of blind luck
and evolution? That one single cell amoeba kept evolving over billions of
years into incredibly complex strands of DNA for millions of completely
unconnected creatures?

Isn't Evolution an act of faith? Isn't the belief in no intelligent higher
power also a religion?


Reply via email to