I really enjoy (for want of a better description) my practice, whether
its Vipassana or an attempt at Shikontaza. The problem I have is I
frequently feel the desire to analytically meditate on Emptiness. For
instance the Tibetan method of logically trying to identify an
inherently existent 'I' then seeing its empty nature. 

How can we reconcile the two methods, they are so pole apart as to
seem irreconcilable?

All advice gratefully received!

Regards,

Tony...


------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to