This is not true of Zen at all. A person in a society usually adopts the
beliefs, moral, ethics that have been passed down to him/her. There is nothing
inherently true in those beliefs. Often a person will face a situation which
demands he act in accordance with his society's moals/religious beliefs but
which creates a conflict with his individual conscience. This in turn creates a
constant 'mulling' over of the situation eg, is it 'just', good or bad etc.
This is the very thing Zen stands against because this constant thinking and
rationalising comes from an ego at war with itself and the moral beliefs of
society (such beliefs are more often than not an obstruction to executing an
immediate action). A Zen-aware person has broken thru the belief system of his
culture and has become a 'master' of himself and so acts instantly with no
thought of what is 'just', good/bad according to a hegemonic system that comes
from outside of himself.
So, a person acting from the Zen standpoint is far from amoral. They are always
open, present, balanced and acting beyond ego. It is the taking away of a
belief in morals that creates this state (enlightenment) but which produces
behaviour that could be called 'moral' as viewed by most of the worlds major
--- On Tue, 13/1/09, fitness4u2163 <fitness1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Anthony Wu > Karma is the best thing to ensure moral values. As
as they hear about moral values, many will say we are just dogmatic. >
It is disturbing to me that many who want to practice zen think it is
some amoral system to ease their conscience every day so they can do
evil to others while feeling a sense of peace and happiness.