I am a little confused by such emphatic posts, perhaps you can elaborate.
Why would "zen" in the US be shallow, could you give some evidence of this?
Are these people you talk about that make money just using "zen" to make money?
Haven't most Zen lineages been in the business to pull in money. Zen in terms
of Organization, has always had a variety of experiences with money. Money is
part of the "zen" path.
Why are they not teaching, what is the proof of this "not teaching."
donkey is wearing his shades today, still unhappy
K among the curious
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, "roloro1557" <roloro1...@...> wrote:
> I can't speak for others of course. What I'm saying is the opposite,
> much of the "zen" practiced in the US is shallow. This is partly because many
> people in the US are shallow, but it is also because many "teachers" and
> "masters" and other so-called experts are out to make money (as we have been
> discussing in another thread) rather that actually teach.
> --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Chris Austin-Lane <chris@> wrote:
> > Surely you aren't saying that Zen has made the US more shallow?
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: