There may not be a difference for the jurors but there is a difference for the group as a whole, since DNA analysis is more accurate than entrail reading.
Modern technological societies require much more trust than less complex societies. Any one could buy some DNA sequencer and build some super virus in their basement. Anyone could blow up a natural gas pipeline. And science is much bigger: I could learn imbibe lifetime most of 1800s science but not even one sub field of current science. No matter how much I understand about DNA sequences and probability, if I do not perform the tests my self, I have to trust the person reporting the test results. Thanks, Chris Austin-Lane Sent from a cell phone On Oct 29, 2010, at 19:32, <[email protected]> wrote: > I just don't see any difference ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
