ED,
 
You are right. Though I support Osho's view on zen having no attitudes toward 
sex, I am against his comment on Tantra being a 'medicine'. At best, Tantra is 
a way to cover up lust. I said lust is unavoidable, but should have 
restrictions. If you cannot fly in the sky, you should be limited in sexuality 
as well. If a zen master using his 'no attitudes' on sex to have an affair with 
his student, it is as much as flying in the sky without a turbojet engine.
 
 
Anthony

--- On Tue, 15/2/11, ED <[email protected]> wrote:


From: ED <[email protected]>
Subject: [Zen] Zen, Tantra and Sex
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, 15 February, 2011, 11:55 PM


  




 
Steve, perhaps the zen teachers we have been discussing were exhibiting their 
zenish 'no attitude' toward sex?
Anthony, Osho has an attitude toward Tantra - but it is quite the opposite 
to yours!
--ED
 
> [Excerpt from] Osho on Zen Approach towards Sex
> Question - Osho, What is the Zen Approach towards Sex? The Zen people seem to 
> have a neuter gender, or asexual aura around them.
> Osho - Zen has no attitudes about sex, and that is the beauty of Zen. To have 
> an attitude means you are still obsessed this way or that. Somebody is 
> against sex -- he has an attitude; and somebody is for sex -- he has an 
> attitude. And for and against go together like two wheels of a bullock cart. 
> They are not enemies, they are friends, partners in the same business. ...
> Zen has no attitude about sex. Why should one have any attitude about sex? 
> That's the beauty of it -- Zen is utterly natural. Do you have any attitudes 
> about drinking water? Do you have any attitudes about taking food? Do you 
> have any attitudes about going to sleep in the night? No attitudes. ...

> ... Zen has no attitudes about sex. Zen is very simple, Zen is innocent. Zen 
> is childlike. It says there is no need to have any attitudes. Why? Do you 
> have any attitude about sneezing? -- to sneeze or not, whether it is sin or 
> virtue. You don't have any attitude. ...
> Tantra has an attitude about sex. The reason? -- it tries to redress what the 
> society has done. Tantra is medical. The society has repressed sex; Tantra 
> comes as a remedy to help you redress balance. You have leaned too much to 
> the left; Tantra comes and helps you to lean to the right. And to redress the 
> balance sometimes you have to lean too much to the right, only then the 
> balance is gained. ...  Tantra is a remedy.
> ... The so-called religions say sex is sin and Tantra says sex is the only 
> sacred phenomenon. Tantra is a remedy. Zen is not a remedy. Zen is the state 
> when the illness has disappeared; and of course, with the illness, the remedy 
> too. Once you are cured of your illness you don't go on carrying the 
> prescription and the bottle and the medicine with you. You throw it. It goes 
> to the dustbin.
> Ordinary society is against sex; Tantra comes to help humanity, to give sex 
> back to humanity. And when the sex has been given back, then arises Zen. Zen 
> has no attitude. Zen is pure health.
Source - Osho Book "The Diamond Sutra"
 






Reply via email to