The Nature of Right-Mindfulness: a Theravadin Perspective


I thought I might post this since we have been discussing the nature of
mindfulness. Here is one possible Theravada perspective. Mindfulness
itself cannot be defined because it belongs to the realm of ultimate
realities: actualities that cannot be broken down into finer subjective
experiences. However, the classical Theravada way of discussing absolute
realities is to discuss them in terms of their functions and
characteristics.



"The function of mindfulness is to keep the object in view by
neither forgetting it nor allowing it to disappear." (U Pandita: In
This Very Life). This explains the literal meaning of the word sati
(Pali) or smrti (Sanskrit) as remembering. Sati is the remembering of
what needs to be remembered in any situation. It remembers the object,
objects or processes of contemplation (mentality/materiality) and also
what we are doing. When you have the experience of going off to do
something in your home, and then forget what it was you had set out to
do, or when you begin to say something and then forget what it was that
you were going to say, you have lost your sati/smrti. It is often
confused with concentration. A meditator can have very strong
concentration, and still have a lapse of mindfulness. This is what
happens when we have been on retreat for some time and our mind loses
the breath, and we go off fantasies, lust or anger. Have you noticed how
powerful those moments of anger or lust can be on retreat, or how vivid
the fantasies? That is because the mind goes into them with all the
power of the samadhi that has been generated in the prior days. It is
like a heavy fast moving train jumping the track. The mass or weight of
the train is the samadhi. The momentum is the energy in the mind, and
the jumping off the track is the lapse of mindfulness.



Mindfulness also has the function of protecting the mind. Somewhere in
the Dhammapada (sorry I don't have time to source it), the Buddha
said something like: "Just as rain cannot enter a well thatched
roof, defilement cannot enter the mind one who is fully mindful."
Continuity in the state of mindfulness therefore brings with it a great
purity.



Non-superficiality is an important characteristic of mindfulness. As
mindfulness deepens, the objects of contemplation, in this case the flow
of mentality and materiality, are increasingly penetrated. At first the
breath is coarse and not clearly felt, but over time mindfulness reveals
the finer currents of sensation that make up the breath, just so with
every other aspect of both five aggregates. Just as a stone sinks to the
bottom of a river, mindfulness leads consciousness and understanding to
gradually penetrate and eventually completely permeate our experience.



The Buddha said, "Mindfulness is everywhere useful." It is the
one mental factor that will develop all of the necessary wholesome
mental factors that support awakening. For example, the continuous
application of mindfulness rouses energy in consciousness. The
continuous setting up face to face with the objects of contemplation
develops samadhi, and as the mind penetrates its present experience more
and more deeply with the maturing of mindfulness, more and more is seen
and understood. In this way mindfulness develops understanding and
insight. As experience deepens and wisdom reveals the four noble truths,
the mind gains trust, sadha/sradh, and begins to rest in its experience.
The settling of the mind under the influence of samadhi and trust brings
tranquility. These last three together bring intense lucidity and purity
to the mind, which in turn enable more wisdom. In this way all of the 37
requisites of enlightenment are developed. I would say therefore that
mindfulness, if supported by sila, (virtue, morality) is the womb of
bodhi.

Reply via email to