Bill,
 
Then, Kapleau's wife acquired delusion after years of hard zen practice, under 
Yasutani Roshi, who specialized in teaching delusion.
 
Nevertheless, I would appreciate your presentation of non-delusional 
enlightenment.
 
Anthony

--- On Sun, 28/8/11, Bill! <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Bill! <[email protected]>
Subject: [Zen] Re: Words attempting to describe experiences.
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, 28 August, 2011, 4:30 PM


  



Anthony,

I would call that delusion...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@...> wrote:
>
> Bill,
>  
> How do you explain the following:
>  
> Looking into faces, I see something of the long chain of their past 
> existence, and sometimes something of the future.
>  
> Anthony
> 
> --- On Sat, 27/8/11, Bill! <BillSmart@...> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: Bill! <BillSmart@...>
> Subject: [Zen] Re: Words attempting to describe experiences.
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Saturday, 27 August, 2011, 9:29 PM
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> Anthony,
> 
> I read the passages but don't understand your question about 'other ways of 
> enlightenment'. What 'way of enlightenment' do you think these passages show? 
> You say a 'Buddhist way', but I don't see a lot of Buddhism in these 
> passages...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> >
> > I have extracted an episode from the Three Pillars of Zen, by Philip 
> > Kapleau. The author is a 'Canadian housewife', who is said to be Kapleau's 
> > wife. I would call the article a Buddhist way of enlightenment. It implies 
> > the existence of karma and rebirth Are there other ways of enlightenment? I 
> > don't know. Please show me.
> >  
> > A Canadian housewife had the following ‘revealed’ to her:
> >  
> > 1)      The world as apprehended by the senses is the least 
> > true (in the sense of complete), the least dynamic (in the sense of the 
> > eternal movement), and the least important in a vast ‘geometry of 
> > existence’ of unspeakable profundity, whose rate of vibration, whose 
> > intensity and subtlety are beyond verbal descripton.
> > 2)      Words are cumbersome and primitive-almost useless in 
> > trying to suggest the true multidimensional workings of an indescribable 
> > vast complex of dynamic force, to contact which one must abandon 
> > one’s normal level of consciousness.
> > 3)      The least act, such as eating or scratching an arm, 
> > is not at all simple. It is merely a visible moment in a network of causes 
> > and effects reaching forward into Unknowingness and back into an infinity 
> > of Silence, where individual consciousness cannot even enter. There is 
> > truly nothing to know, nothing that can be known.
> > 4)      The physical world is an infinity of movement, of 
> > Time-Existence. But simultaneously it is an infinity of Silence and 
> > Voidness. Each object is thus transparent. Everything has its own special 
> > character, its own karma of ‘life in time’, but at the same 
> > time there is no place where there is emptiness, where one object does not 
> > flow into another.
> > 5)      The least expression of wheather variation, a soft 
> > rain or a gentle breeze, touches me as a-what can I say?-miracle of 
> > unmatched wonder, beauty and goodness. There is nothing to do; just to be 
> > is a supremely total act.
> > 6)      Looking into faces, I see something of the long 
> > chain of their past existence, and sometimes something of the future. The 
> > past ones recede behind the outer face like ever-finer tissues, yet are at 
> > the same time impregnated in it.
> > 7)      When I am in solitude I can hear a 
> > ‘song’ coming forth from everything. Each and everything has 
> > its own song; even moods, thoughts, and feelings have their finer songs. 
> > Yet beneath this variety they intermingle in one inexpressibly vast unity.
> > 8)      I feel a love which, without object, is best called 
> > lovingness. But my old emotional reactions still coarsely interfere with 
> > the expressions of this supremely gentle and effortless lovingness.
> > 9)      I feel a consciousness which is neither myself nor 
> > not myself, which is protecting or leading me into directions helpful to my 
> > proper growth and maturity, and propelling me away from that which is 
> > against that growth. It is like a stream into which I have flowed and, 
> > joyously, which is carrying me beyond myself.
> >
>






Reply via email to