Panda.,
> SPLABBERT!
That's easy for YOU to say!
Aside from that, ...I agree. ;-)
--Joe
PS But you speak from the point of view of Awakening. In our Way, one comes
back all the same, anyhow, and uses your ten-thousand arms and all those eyes,
and does Yeoman's work (ha, as if you could avoid it!), even though everybody
else is not fooling you (not able to fool you); they just don't know that they
are *trying* to fool you. To play the game, it's better to pitch in, than to
make pronouncements. As you've pitched-in here! TNX, and howdy. --J.
> "pandabananasock" <pandabananasock@...> wrote:
>
> but what problem? Both: nobody to be saved, and nothing to save them from.
> Samsara and not-samsara. Only "Is-ness", without the "Is", or the "ness",
> and without the "without". No enlightenment, nobody to be enlightened.
> SPLABBERT!
>
------------------------------------
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
