you have to be rational to survive joe...merle
  
Joe,

I agree with you about all this.

I too was educated in and used rationality intensely in my profession - 
computers/data analysis.  It's very useful for making a living.

Modern Western education is primarily about memorization and secondarily about 
rationality.

Zen is about experience.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], "Joe" <desert_woodworker@...> wrote:
>
> Bill!,
> 
> It's my training in Philosophy and formal logic talking.
> 
> A concept may be rational -- in every sense -- even if no empirical proof or 
> demonstration is yet available for it.
> 
> For example: "String Theory" in modern Physics may be a rational theory and 
> "strings" may be a rational concept, even if experiments to demonstrate the 
> existence of strings have not been devised, or have thus far shown negative 
> results.  Those Physicists working on "strings" think they are being UTTERLY 
> rational and that their science is rational, even if, perhaps, they've been 
> wasting their time for the last 35 years in the development of the theory, or 
> find, finally, that it is un-testable.
> 
> Of course I know where you're coming from with regard to Zen practice and to 
> our lived experience, especially in regard to realization.  I hope I'm coming 
> from there too!  ;-)
> 
> But my Philosophical training sometime asserts myself and wants to see the 
> world adhere to technical understanding and use of Philosophical technical 
> terms.  ;-)
> 
> I know it's "unreasonable" of me.  But, hey, my education was very expensive 
> and pretty painful!  ;-)
> 
> Just wait until somebody tells me that I or somebody has "a VALID point": 
> drives me up the wall!  ;-)
> 
> Strong practice, now,
> 
> --Joe
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
> >
> > Joe,
> > 
> > Right, sort of.
> > 
> > To be a 'rationalist' is to be someone who depends on rationality which is 
> > clearly illusory.
> > 
> > As someone who practices zen which is based entirely on experience I would 
> > hope I would be an 'experientialist' - or a 'realist'.
>


 

Reply via email to