Merle, <br/><br/>You've got that completely backwards. You're the one saying 
you know we have a soul. I'm saying I see absolutely no evidence in reality 
that points to a soul. And I gave you personal examples. All you've done is 
point to google and dead philosophers. And you say we're lazy!!<br/><br/>Ok, 
I'll try your methods. Please read this and come back to us:<br/><br/>""There 
are some philosophers," he says, "who imagine we are every moment conscious of 
what we call 'ourself,' that we feel its existence and its continuance in 
existence and so we are certain, both of its perfect identity and simplicity. 
For my part, when I enter most intimately into what I call 'myself' I always 
stumble on some particular perception or other -- of heat or cold, light or 
shade, love or hatred, pain or pleasure. I never catch myself... and never can 
observe anything but the perception... nor do I conceive what is further 
requisite to make me a perfect non-entity."
 <br/><br/>Bergson says, "All consciousness is time existence; and a conscious 
state is not a state that endures without changing. It is a change without 
ceasing, when change ceases it ceases; it is itself nothing but change." 
<br/><br/>Dealing with this question of soul Prof. James says -- "The 
soul-theory is a complete superfluity, so far as accounting for the actually 
verified facts of conscious experience goes. So far no one can be compelled to 
subscribe to it for definite scientific reasons." In concluding his interesting 
chapter on the soul he says: "And in this book the provisional solution which 
we have reached must be the final word: the thoughts themselves are the 
thinkers." <br/><br/>Watson, a distinguished psychologist, states: "No one has 
ever touched a soul or has seen one in a test tube or has in any way come into 
relationship with it as he has with the other objects of his daily experience. 
Nevertheless to doubt its existence is to become
 a heretic and once might possibly even had led to the loss of one's head. Even 
today a man holding a public position dare not question it." <br/><br/>The 
Buddha anticipated these facts some 2500 years ago. <br/><br/>According to 
Buddhism mind is nothing but a complex compound of fleeting mental states. One 
unit of consciousness consists of three phases -- arising or genesis (uppada) 
static or development (thiti), and cessation or dissolution (bhanga). 
Immediately after the cessation stage of a thought moment there occurs the 
genesis stage of the subsequent thought-moment. Each momentary consciousness of 
this ever-changing life-process, on passing away, transmits its whole energy, 
all the indelibly recorded impressions to its successor. Every fresh 
consciousness consists of the potentialities of its predecessors together with 
something more. There is therefore, a continuous flow of consciousness like a 
stream without any interruption. The subsequent
 thought moment is neither absolutely the same as its predecessor -- since that 
which goes to make it up is not identical -- nor entirely another -- being the 
same continuity of kamma energy. Here there is no identical being but there is 
an identity in process. <br/><br/>Every moment there is birth, every moment 
there is death. The arising of one thought-moment means the passing away of 
another thought-moment and vice versa. In the course of one life-time there is 
momentary rebirth without a soul. <br/><br/>It must not be understood that a 
consciousness is chopped up in bits and joined together like a train or a 
chain. But, on the contrary, "it persistently flows on like a river receiving 
from the tributary streams of sense constant accretions to its flood, and ever 
dispensing to the world without the thought-stuff it has gathered by the 
way."[12] It has birth for its source and death for its mouth. The rapidity of 
the flow is such that hardly is there
 any standard whereby it can be measured even approximately. However, it 
pleases the commentators to say that the time duration of one thought-moment is 
even less than one-billionth part of the time occupied by a flash of lightning. 
<br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone

Reply via email to