scary..as sometimes one feels the communication is between individuals...this 
then is an illusion?..merle
  
Merle,

Of course you can 'butt in'!

That's what an open forum is for; but when we do that in the forum we call it 
'spontaneously participating in the discussion'...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
>  may i butt in:... 
> 
> folk have preconceived ideas about most things by the time they can speak as 
> babies...
> 
>  as adults they are filled to the brim in their minds with preconceived 
> ideas...programmed up so to speak...
> 
> to see the truth...one must take off the blindfold and see with a fresh eye 
> and an open mind
> 
> just as it is
> 
> away from the shadows..into the clear light of day...
> 
> merle
> 
> 
> 
>   
> Edgar,
> 
> Thanks for posting this.
> 
> As you know I've struggled for sometime about just what term to express what 
> I call 'illusions' - thoughts, logic, forms, etc...  I rejected 'delusions' 
> and 'hallucinations' because they do carry with them a sense of falseness or 
> mental disorder.  I've thought about using 'mental models' and I like 
> 'perceptions', but in the end, or at least for now, have stuck with the 
> traditional Buddhist term 'illusions'.
> 
> The definition given below of Maya is the definition I intend when I use the 
> term 'illusion',  I've carefully read the article below through twice and I 
> believe it supports everything I've said in the past and certainly in recent 
> posts.
> 
> I myself think of the term illusions as very similar to the way we use the 
> term 'illusion' when we describe 'magic' or 'sleight-of-hand' tricks.  The 
> actions seem to show something happening that is in fact not happening, or at 
> least is not happening the way we think it is.  It is our mind (intellect) 
> that adds-in non-existent 'clues' or ignores existent clues and then makes 
> assumptions that lead us to a false conclusion about what happen and how it 
> happened.  This is especially a good example because it is us, our intellect, 
> that projects the misleading clues or filters out the missed clues and 
> creates as a false perception of what we are experiencing (seeing in the case 
> of 'magic' tricks).
> 
> Since you posted this I assume you also think it supports your worldview but 
> does not support mine (or at least what you think mine is).  If you'll point 
> out areas of the article that you think do either of those I'd be happy to 
> engage with you on a discussion about those.
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> >
> > Bill,
> > 
> > Philosophy and illusion 
> > [edit]
> > 
> > Just like many other words often used in a different sense in spirituality 
> > the word "illusion" is used to denote different aspects in Hindu Philosophy 
> > (Maya). Many Monist philosophies clearly demarcate illusion from truth and 
> > falsehood. As per Hindu advaita philosophy, Illusion is something which is 
> > not true and not false. Whereas in general usage it is common to assume 
> > that illusion is false, Hindu philosophy makes a distinction between Maya 
> > (illusion) and falsehood. In terms of this philosophy maya is true in 
> > itself but it is not true in comparison with the truth. As per this 
> > philosophy, illusion is not the opposite of truth or reality. Based on 
> > these assumptions Vedas declare that the world as humans normally see is 
> > illusion (Maya). It does not mean the world is not real. The world is only 
> > so much real as the image of a person in a mirror. The world is not 
> > real/true when compared to the reality. But the world is also not false. 
> > Falsehood is
>  something which does not exist. if we apply this philosophy to the above 
> example, the illusion is not actually illusion but is false. This is because 
> in general usage people tend to consider lllusion to be the same as 
> falsehood. As per adishankar's a guru of monist teachings the world we think 
> is not true but is an illusion (not true not false). The truth of the world 
> is something which can only be experienced by removing the identity (ego).
> > 
> > Edgar
> >
>


 

Reply via email to