Folks,

     Hi, how are you all?

     According with James C. Scott, author of the book "The Moral 
Economy of the Peasant", peasants in pre-colonial southeast Asia 
expected their fellow villagers, relatives and/or patrons to help 
them in times of necessity. So, if, in a particular year, you had a 
disastrous harvest, you could always resort to them in order to 
obtain the means necessary to stay above the subsistence line. 
Naturally, you were also expected to help your fellow villagers and 
relatives if that become necessary.
     Researchers in the area argue that this sort of "moral system" 
was predominant in pre-capitalistic, rural economies. It is 
interesting to notice that Zen, as a established doctrine, was 
created and developed in Imperial China and, later, in medieval Japan.
     Curiously, according to the Zen Buddhist ideology, the idea of 
self is delusional. Actually, we are all interconected and we all 
belong to the same Existence. This concept of unity, naturally, can 
be seen as an eco of the economic system that constituted the very 
basis of those pre-capitalistic socities. In other words, the notion 
of Unity was not an enigmatic and abstract concept inherited from 
buddhist tradition. It was actually an ideological concept which main 
goal was to legitimize and ensure the continuity of the moral system 
that constituted the basis of the economic and political life of 
those Eastern, pre-capitalistic socities. 
     Sometimes, I wonder whether this concept of unity, or 
interdependence, could be reintroduced in contemporary society, in an 
economic and political level. In a way, I believe, certain japanese 
corporations managed to achieve that, within the certain limits (The 
corporations offered life-long employment and benefits and, in 
exchange, expected loyalty and dedication). The capitalistic system, 
however, is based on temporary and flexible economic relationships, 
which means that a labor contract can be terminated at any time. Not 
by coincidence, our society is also dominated by individualism and 
materialism. Curiously, the very flexibility that allowed the 
bourgeois society to grow and dominate the world is also one of its 
main shortcommings.
      In this perspective, Zen Buddhism could constitute the 
ideological basis of a new political and corporative elite. The idea 
is not exactly original. However, I think it would be interesting to 
contemplate this possibility.

      Regards,

      Francisco.

    





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WwRTUD/SOnJAA/i1hLAA/S27xlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Noble Eightfold Path: Right View, Right Intention, Right Speech, Right  Action, 
Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, Right Concentration, Right Livelihood 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZenForum/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to