Thanks Jonathan !

Jim

James M Doherty
President REVIVE CONSULTING LLC
EMAIL: j...@jdoherty.net
PHONE: 512-650-2997
Patents Held:
 http://patent.ipexl.com/inventor/James_M_Doherty_1.html



On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Jonathan Haddock <
jonathan.hadd...@ekservices.org> wrote:

> Hello James,
>
>
>
> You’d want the firewall to point to the farm’s address.  I can’t see in
> the screenshot (it’s too small) but if you’re load balancing the traffic
> from the firewall (e.g. internal connections to a web server) you’d want
> that pointing to the farm’s virtual IP.
>
>
>
> For example, see the (redacted) IP in the red box below:
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *Jonathan Haddock **MSc MBCS*
>
> Network and Security Engineer
>
> *EK Services*
>
>
>
> Tel No: 01227 862 036
>
> jonathan.hadd...@ekservices.org
>
>
>
> *EK Services - working in partnership with Canterbury City Council, Dover
> District Council and Thanet District Council*
>
>
>
> *From:* James Doherty [mailto:j...@jdoherty.net]
> *Sent:* 21 September 2015 18:34
> *To:* zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* [Zenloadbalancer-support] FIREWALL ROUTE
>
>
>
> If my eth0 address for an http farm points to 192.168.1.225
>
> and my eth0:1 points to 102.168.1.226
>
> should my FIREWALL be routing traffice to the 226 or 225 address?
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
>
>
> James M Doherty
> President REVIVE CONSULTING LLC
> EMAIL: j...@jdoherty.net
> PHONE: 512-650-2997
> Patents Held:
>  http://patent.ipexl.com/inventor/James_M_Doherty_1.html
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__patent.ipexl.com_inventor_James-5FM-5FDoherty-5F1.html&d=BQMFaQ&c=Z2s6Dur3NAYMdtMp9rcLil3wOzceliw5DrnjnuOKPOg&r=4efM7iEQM1o8h8Mxg6LqhHKk3UsSHRgfg437qoLgBLA&m=_mvyXoYmPKujY3hOHhOmLh2xsfXgxKqmYjBZHWvjFUU&s=k1d16-Nf6MU6r1fbaayov4upoRhhtasNh_XbqV0Wu9M&e=>
>
> ------------------------------
> Please consider the environment before printing this email. This e-mail
> and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee
> and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
> If you are not the addressee, or have received this email in error, please
> notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy,
> disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.
> Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender,
> except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the
> views of EK Services.
> Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
> viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the
> onward transmission, opening or use of this email and any attachments will
> not adversely affect its systems or data.
> No responsibility is accepted by EK Services in this regard and the
> recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers
> appropriate.
> All communications sent to or from EK Services may be subject to recording
> and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list
> Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list
Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support

Reply via email to