I have a server (an IBM Blade running W2K3) that is having problems with HD utilization calcs.
It has this symptom, a small primary drive (36 gb) and big secondary drives (400+ gb) and when it calculates the utilization it uses the used drive space of the secondary (lets say 180 gb) to subtract from the primary and reports it is overutilized by 500%. The only thing that is different that I can see is that the drives are labelled C: and E: (rather than C: and D:). I have other blades that are modelled properly, but they have C: and D: drives. Any ideas? Remodelling didn't seem to change anything. _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
