Hi Sven,
I understand now... you expected to see graph's 95% value back in time.
That's something to think about. Is it more important to store "data
blocks used over time", or is it more important to store "percentage
used over time"? We are storing the former and using it to graph the
latter.
For historical consistency, you would like the %-age, but for predicting
when you are going to buy your next bigger hard drive, we want to know
actual blocks used.
Erik, any thoughts?
-Eric
Schuran, Sven wrote:
Hi,
There had been alarm for a drive 95% full with 100GB.
Performance Graph was showing 95%. Thasts OK
We changed the hard drive to 180 GB. So the alarm wnt away.
Performace Graph was showing 60% or whatever.
But the data stored in the rrd Graph before replacement ist not showiing 95%
anymore, it is showing 60%.
Sven
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Erik A. Dahl
Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Januar 2007 04:44
An: General discussion of using zenoss system
Betreff: Re: [zenoss-users] Rrd tool recalculation
Sven,
I'm not sure I understand. You had a drive that was at 95% full and was 100MB.
You changed it to be 180MB and the alarm went away?? That seems right but I'm
guessing I didn't understand correctly.
-EAD
On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Schuran, Sven wrote:
Hi,
We have a file-server, this one went 95% full.
So we decided to change image the system and changed the Harddisk.
From 100GB to 180 GB.
Know the rrd Graph from the past got recalculated and are not showing
95%.
This seems to be a big bug.
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
