As for miscnfsopshigh, I never get any data for that oid when I was monitoring 
it. I agree that miscnfsops is dprecated and when I was using that oid, the 
graph would go into negative values.

----- Original Message -----
From: Sanabria, Allen
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed Mar 28 18:12:12 2007
Subject: Re: [zenoss-users] Re: Monitor NetApp OPS

I've been using miscnfsopslow for about2 months. From comparing that to sysstat 
nfsops from netapp command line, it is accurate and is a counter. I have 8 
FAS940c and that's what I use.

----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed Mar 28 17:49:18 2007
Subject: [zenoss-users] Re: Monitor NetApp OPS

With all due respect, I'm not sure the NFS counters are correct in the provided 
rrd template. According to Netapp, miscnfsops has been deprecated and replaced 
by a 2 part counter miscHighNfsOps and miscLowNfsOps (which were treated as 
guages??). See below.

Wondering is anyone knows how to join these two oids and have them storage as a 
single counter during collection. I thought about an Tales expression at the 
time the graph is built but that would only work with a guage type int, not a 
step counter.




miscHighNfsOps          OBJECT-TYPE
        SYNTAX                  Counter
        ACCESS                  read-only
        STATUS                  mandatory
        DESCRIPTION
                        "The total number of Server side NFS calls since
                         the last boot.  This object returns the most
                         significant 32 bits of the 64 bit unsigned integer."
        ::= { misc 5 }

        miscLowNfsOps           OBJECT-TYPE
        SYNTAX                  Counter
        ACCESS                  read-only
        STATUS                  mandatory
        DESCRIPTION
                        "The total number of Server side NFS calls since
                         the last boot.  This object returns the least
                         significant 32 bits of the 64 bit unsigned integer."

------------------------
Dave Brown




-------------------- m2f --------------------

Read this topic online here:
http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=4943#4943

-------------------- m2f --------------------



_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users

Reply via email to