Yes 800 makes no sense it should be -1 so it can float. I added it
to the tree cleanup ticket.
http://dev.zenoss.org/trac/ticket/1288
-EAD
On May 10, 2007, at 12:58 PM, tbennedum wrote:
Ok, I understand what you're saying. But it certainly isn't
intuitive. Saying a CPU is at 800% utilization doesn't make any
sense. If what we're measuring really isn't a percentage, than why
does the graph purport that it is? Maybe the CPU utilization graph
should be redesigned?
While I don't claim that MS knows what their doing, they seem to be
able to get properly scaled CPU utilization figure in the task
manager. Even the vmstat command seems to give a reasonable
percentage measurement. Why can't we get something more meaning
into Zenoss?
-Tab
------------------------
Tab Bennedum
-------------------- m2f --------------------
Read this topic online here:
http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=6489#6489
-------------------- m2f --------------------
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
