not exactly. This is just for Active/Standby. If you want active
active, you are talking about a manager of managers type architecture.
Give the ZenOSS guys a call and talk to them about the MOM architecture
possibilities in the 2.0 release. Lots of good stuff there.
Jason
The place where you made your stand never mattered,
only that you were there... and still on your feet
MoreDakka wrote:
So in theory there could be a central database (that will have backups or
redundancy) then have two separate zenoss boxes on two different connections
both connecting to the central database. So each machine will act
independently but will feed from the same data, essentially making both of them
the same machine. Would that be a correct way to assume that?
Thanks!
------------------------
Josh Henry
-------------------- m2f --------------------
Read this topic online here:
http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=6839#6839
-------------------- m2f --------------------
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
