cluther wrote: > > Daniel, > > It is definitely still possible to distribute your performance > monitors. In fact, it is much easier to do so in 2.0 thanks to the > ZenHub architecture change. However, there is no documentation on how > to actually do it. > > The quick version of things is that the following daemons are > considered "Performance Monitors" and need to be run on the > distributed performance monitor: > > zenperfsnmp > zencommand > zenprocess > zenwin > zeneventlog > zenwinmodeler > > They should all be configured with the following two additions to > their corrosponding .conf files. > > monitor monitorName > hubhost fqdn.of.central.zenoss.server > > Chet Luther > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > zenoss-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
Thanks for the info, Chet. Would it be safe to assume the DB would need to be set up to accept connections from the remote boxes as well? IIRC, that was part of the pre-2.x config for remote monitors as well. ------------------------ Daniel Schrock -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=9365#9365 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
