On Thursday 07 February 2008 09:28:41 kris wrote:
> Oh, in seconds? I checked out! It is right!
> But it is not intuitive at all!!:(
> Maybe developers will chenge this to "hours" and "minutes" format
> Our help desk and technician guys  will not understand this graph:). It is
> not user friendly and too difficult for them:(
>

Wise man say "He who measures battery life in seconds needs more 
batteries." :-)

I don't suppose it's any more odd than measuring interface throughput in 
octets and reporting as bits/sec even though the conversion from octets to 
bits never happened. This has been a problem in zenoss for quite some time. 
The graphs are labled bits/sec but are reporting octets/sec.

>
>
>
> -------------------- m2f --------------------
>
> Read this topic online here:
> http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=16179#16179
>
> -------------------- m2f --------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zenoss-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users


_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users

Reply via email to