When I try to model a device I am getting the following, then nothing will 
appear to be discovered if it is a new device:


> 2008-06-11 05:47:01 ERROR zen.ZenModeler: Client HOSTNAME02 finished: 
> [Failure instance: Traceback (failure with no frames): 
> Products.ZenHub.PBDaemon.RemoteException: Remote exception: 
> sre_constants.error: nothing to repeatTraceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/opt/zenoss/Products/ZenHub/PBDaemon.py", line 46, in inner
>     return callable(*args, **kw)
>   File "/opt/zenoss/Products/ZenHub/services/ModelerService.py", line 83, in 
> remote_applyDataMaps
>     if adm._applyDataMap(device, map):
>   File "/opt/zenoss/Products/DataCollector/ApplyDataMap.py", line 140, in 
> _applyDataMap
>     changed = self._updateRelationship(tobj, datamap)
>   File "/opt/zenoss/Products/DataCollector/ApplyDataMap.py", line 183, in 
> _updateRelationship
>     changed = self._createRelObject(device, objmap, rname)
>   File "/opt/zenoss/Products/DataCollector/ApplyDataMap.py", line 286, in 
> _createRelObject
>     remoteObj = constructor(device, objmap)
>   File "/opt/zenoss/Products/ZenModel/OSProcess.py", line 50, in 
> createFromObjectMap
>     if pc.match(fullname):
>   File "/opt/zenoss/Products/ZenModel/OSProcessClass.py", line 117, in match
>     return re.search(self.regex, procKey)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py", line 134, in search
>     return _compile(pattern, flags).search(string)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/sre.py", line 227, in _compile
>     raise error, v # invalid expression
> error: nothing to repeat
> 
> ]
> 


This used to work, now what has changed? I believe the only thing that was 
changed was the removal of a couple of processes from the process "root".

Now this comes to my second problem, after removing the processes from the 
"root" I am unable to view the OS tab on the devices that had these processes 
enabled for monitoring.

I have refreshed caches, rebooted both workstation and server and still having 
the same problems.


Any ideas are much appreciated? 

After using Cacti / Nagios combinations for years I am quite impressed with 
Zenoss - hopefully stability is not going to be too much of a problem as this 
will be a critical part of our infrastructure should testing go well.   :D




-------------------- m2f --------------------

Read this topic online here:
http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=21204#21204

-------------------- m2f --------------------



_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users

Reply via email to