I suppose from some users perspective, it's unclear which is the preferred method for getting the perf graphs. For my environment, for instance, we can use pretty much anything, so SNMP is fine, but so is SSH. The question becomes, which is "better", and why. So far, I'm not sure one is better than the other, the difference has to do with security concerns and environmental variables.
However, is there a performance difference for Zenoss or the remote servers that should lead users in one direction than the other if there aren't overriding environmental concerns? -- James Pulver Information Technology Area Supervisor LEPP Computer Group Cornell University Matt Ray wrote, On 8/4/2009 6:31 PM: > Sure, you could copy the templates from the /Devices/Server/Linux that > you want to use to do this. I'm not sure why you'd want this, unless > the SSH-based ones are missing perf graphs (in which case we should > get them in there). If you want to do this, I'd suggest creating a > new device class, something along the lines of /Devices/Server/SSH/ > LinuxSNMP and mix and match the pieces you want. > > Thanks, > Matt Ray > Zenoss Community Manager > community.zenoss.com > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > zenoss-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
