[email protected] said: > On 2 February 2010 10:33, Steven McCoy <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you are specifying just "eth0;" it will return NOTUNIQ, however > specifying a multicast address from one family will force the interface to > be resolved using the family of the group. All my boxes have both IPv4 > and > IPv6 addresses and hence why this was implemented. > > > > Actually with just "eth0;" it will resolve the node-name to determine the > default family of the box and use that to force the address family of the > interface.
I don't particulary like this approach since it depends on the node-name resolving to something sane and a lot of people have this set up wrong. What we've decided to do in the mean time is to force OpenPGM to AF_INET in OMQ and we can then revisit this discussion later when have someone who actually needs proper IPv6 support. -mato _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
