On Saturday 27 February 2010 18:51:39 Martin Lucina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [email protected] said:
> > That R[eset] seems strange, so I checked with netstat -anp which
> > revealed
> > tcp 0 0 127.0.0.2:5555 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 3180/server
> >
> > Well, that's not going to work. So I changed a line in server.c :
> > /* Bind to the TCP transport and port 5555 on the 'lo'
> > interface */ rc = zmq_bind (s, "tcp://127.0.0.1:5555");
> > And that's it. Then it runs as intended. But no clue why.
>
> That's strange, looks like zmq_bind() resolved 'lo' to 127.0.0.2 for
> some reason. What does 'ifconfig lo' / 'ip addr' say on your system?
nnservans:~ # ifconfig lo
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:95892 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:95892 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:22431885 (21.3 Mb) TX bytes:22431885 (21.3 Mb)
So a search in another direction took me to /etc/hosts :
127.0.0.1 ad.nl.doubleclick.net
127.0.0.2 nnservans.mobach.nl nnservans
No idea why openSUSE 11.1 bothers to enter these entries in my hosts
file, but I'll try again after updating this file. Clue in sight. :-)
> > Just one question remains : were can I grab in the server
> > environment the IP address and portnumber of the sending client ?
>
> No way to do that at the moment, other than doing it at the app level
> (make up a client ID / use the IP address and stick it in the
> message).
OK, but that's (at least for me) not thrustworthy. Like SMTP telling me
who they are. ;-)
You don't mind if I take a look at the sources to see whether it is
doable for me ?
--
Fred Mobach - [email protected] - [email protected]
website : https://fred.mobach.nl
.... In God we trust ....
.. The rest we monitor ..
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
