On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote:
> It should be explained in more detail: The reason is that "udp" seems to > immediately imply "unicast unreliable transfer" which current "udp" is > definitely not. Quite the opposite: It's multicast and it's reliable. > > The proposition is to rename "udp" to "epgm" which stands for > "encapuslated PGM". "udp" is certainly misleading but "epgm" adds a concept, "encapsulation" which needs learning / explaining. Why not just "pgm"? -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
