On 3/8/10 1:15 AM, "Martin Sustrik" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Example of an application receiving messages consisting of two pieces: > > while (true) { > zmq_recv (s, &msg1, 0); > zmq_recv (s, &msg2, 0); > process_it (msg1, msg2); > } So am I correct in assuming the application would have to know whether the message is multi-part by parsing the message data? If so, I could see this being a bit cumbersome. Does it make more sense to add a field to zmq_msg_t to indicate whether the received message is the last of a group? _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Martin Sustrik
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Chuck Remes
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Martin Sustrik
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Jon Dyte
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Brian Granger
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Martin Sustrik
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Brian Granger
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Martin Sustrik
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Brian Granger
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Martin Sustrik
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Michael Santy
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Martin Sustrik
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Brian Granger
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Martin Sustrik
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Michael Santy
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Brian Granger
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Martin Sustrik
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Brian Granger
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Michael Santy
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous m... Martin Sustrik
- Re: [zeromq-dev] Non-contiguous message thoughts Martin Sustrik
