Adrian, [email protected] said: > [...] > On Thursday 08 April 2010 19.58:08 Wolfgang Barth wrote: > > I tried to build debian packages from the current branch master. > > I'm not sure what is on master these days (Martin? I have posted my current > Debian packaging twice IIRC - was it ever applied? I don't think I got any > feedback.)
My apologies for not following up on this sooner. I would like to apply your current changes in the hg repository at https://fortytwo.ch/hg/pkg-zeromq to the 0MQ git, but debian/copyright on your packaging has changed as follows: diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright index 3839b2d..b53076f 100644 --- a/debian/copyright +++ b/debian/copyright @@ -1,18 +1,105 @@ -This package was debianized by Peter Busser <[email protected]> on -Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:11:38 +0100. +This package was debianized by + Adrian von Bidder <[email protected]> + based on earlier work by Peter Busser <[email protected]> -It was downloaded from http://www.zeromq.org/ + The packaging scripts are ©2009-2010 by these authors and are distributed + under the GPL. (...) In order to apply this to the 0MQ git I need you to do the following: 1) Email me another patch against the 0MQ git which explicitly states that the patch is licensed under the MIT license. 2) Possibly remove/change the "are distributed under the GPL" above, but I'm not sure if that's neccessary, maybe Pieter can advise? Note that I am no licensing expert, I'm just trying to follow the "MIT license for contributions" policy as described by iMatix in the Licensing FAQ and also here: http://www.zeromq.org/blog:why-the-mit-license-for-contributions Further, you can leave hgpkg out of the patch altogether since that doesn't need to be in the 0MQ git. Thanks! -mato _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
