Pieter, [email protected] said: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Martin Lucina <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This is getting off-topic so I'd rather not continue the discussion here. > > If anyone has strong arguments why the zeromq-dev list should *NOT* have a > > Reply-to header set on it, please contact me privately. If I don't hear > > enough complaints by Monday I'll change the current behaviour to set a > > Reply-to. > > Mato, > > I think you didn't get around to doing this? What happened?
I hoped the problem would go away by itself :-) Anyway, seeing that people are still getting confused, it's done now. -mato _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
