On Sunday 11 April 2010 11.29:12 Wolfgang Barth wrote: > zeromq (2.0.6beta.dfsg2~1.gbp6fea42) unstable; urgency=low
Short note about the version number (see also my other email) You probably shouldn't include the ".dfsg" part. I use it to show that I've repackaged the tarball to remove non-free (as defined by Debian) parts, namely the RFCs inside the openpgm tarball. (But again, for locally built packages that's not relevant. But it's probably a good idea if somebody packages for another .deb based distribution.) cheers -- vbi -- featured link: http://www.pool.ntp.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
