[email protected] said:
> On 13/04/2010 15:40, Martin Lucina wrote:
> > [email protected] said:
> >    
> >> On 13 April 2010 21:30, Martin Lucina<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >>
> >>      In my opinion the correct way to do this is to have OpenPGM
> >>      reserve e.g. 5% of the requested data rate for RDATA by default, with 
> >> the
> >>      option to configure the reserved bandwidth amount for those who wish 
> >> to
> >>      shoot themselves in the foot.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Unusually SmartPGM is the only implementation I've seen with rate controls 
> >> and
> >> all it has in respect to RDATA vs. ODATA here is to set RDATA to be say 
> >> maximum
> >> 5% of the rate limit - but not to reserve it solely for RDATA.
> >>      
> > So my reasoning is correct when I say that with the current implementation
> > if I set TWX_MAX_RTE to e.g. 100Mbps, then proceed to publish at 100Mbps
> > and *any* packet loss occurs, things will break?
> >
> > -mato
> >    
> This is exactly what I have noticed on my usage. No RDATA packet

Great, this confirms my findings which makes me happy since I don't feel
like I'm totally in the dark wrt to what is going on :-)

-mato
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to