[email protected] said: > Ah shoot. I really need that. I'll try to resurrect it. What would be a > good alternative name for it? > > Maybe it should come back as a socket option? > > Thoughts?
The original zmq_flush() and the accompanying ZMQ_NOFLUSH flag to send was really more of a hint to the 0MQ core saying "You want to flush this now" rather than a strict disabling of batching per se. I'm not sure if the latter is possible at all, you'll want Martin Sustrik's opinion on that. -mato _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
