Allo! Use larger testsets. With 1700 bytes of data the results are not relevant. Use 100,000 messages at least.
Martin Baribeau, Christian wrote: > Allo! > > > > This is our first attempt at using zeromq. We would like receive some > feedback on what may be wrong with our setup and testing. > > > > We conducted the performance test on two Windows XP Pro SP3 machines > (multi-core, 2 GHz, 2 G RAM, etc) directly connected together through > their 1 Gbps NIC. > > > > For the performance testing, we used the local_thr.c and remote_thr.c > from the perf directory in release 2.0.6 zeromq source tree downloaded > from the web site. The libzmq library and both .c files were > successfully built using the MSVC 2008 Express and the MSVC project file > found in the source tree. No changes were made to the project settings. > > > > Here is a short list of the test results (stdout) from the local_thr.exe: > > > > C:\Work\TestZeroMQ>local_thr.exe tcp://192.168.35.209:667 170 10 > > message size: 170 [B] > > message count: 10 > > mean throughput: 625000 [msg/s] > > mean throughput: 850.000 [Mb/s] > > > > C:\Work\TestZeroMQ>local_thr.exe tcp://192.168.35.209:667 170 100 > > message size: 170 [B] > > message count: 100 > > mean throughput: 309 [msg/s] > > mean throughput: 0.420 [Mb/s] > > > > C:\Work\TestZeroMQ>local_thr.exe tcp://192.168.35.209:667 170 1000 > > message size: 170 [B] > > message count: 1000 > > mean throughput: 201 [msg/s] > > mean throughput: 0.273 [Mb/s] > > > > C:\Work\TestZeroMQ>local_thr.exe tcp://192.168.35.209:667 170 2000 > > message size: 170 [B] > > message count: 2000 > > mean throughput: 201 [msg/s] > > mean throughput: 0.273 [Mb/s] > > > > C:\Work\TestZeroMQ>local_thr.exe tcp://192.168.35.209:667 1700 10 > > message size: 1700 [B] > > message count: 10 > > mean throughput: 24 [msg/s] > > mean throughput: 0.326 [Mb/s] > > > > C:\Work\TestZeroMQ>local_thr.exe tcp://192.168.35.209:667 1700 100 > > message size: 1700 [B] > > message count: 100 > > mean throughput: 21 [msg/s] > > mean throughput: 0.286 [Mb/s] > > > > These results are not in line with the expected performance results > found on the zeromq web site. > > > > Is this a known issue? > > > > Are we make a newbie mistake somewhere? > > > > Are their Windows specific build instructions/settings/issues we should > know? > > > > Thank you > > > > Christian > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This e-mail from Ultra Electronics Holdings plc and any attachments to > it are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be > privileged. If you have received it in error please notify the sender > and delete it from your system. If you are not the intended recipient > you must not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or > distribute its contents to any other person. All communications may be > subject to interception or monitoring for operational and/or security > purposes. Please rely on your own virus checking as the sender cannot > accept any liability for any damage arising from any bug or virus > infection. Ultra Electronics Holdings plc is a company registered in > England and Wales, registration number 2830397. The address of its > registered office is 417 Bridport Road, Greenford, Middlesex, UB6 8UA. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
