Zhou, Kefei Dan wrote: > Jon, > > Ok that makes sense. I am seeing a binary header and follow by the message. > > Is there a version/release where the zmq_queue was fully working? > > > Thanks, > dan > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > Dan,
Not a present. If you use 2.0.6, you will have to manually strip out the address, as described in the process implementing the ZMQ_REP socket. This does work though. I do not use the zmq_queue executable but use the queue class to feed inprocess threads to do the work. In the master branch devices are now available via an api, so you can use them intra-process as well, but all these api's are experimental and may change. Recently multi-part messages have been added and these will now be used to implement multi-hop request/response as far as I understand. But the multi-hop additions currently broke the xreq/xrep. Martin Sustrik may be able to give a better timeframe for this work. WRT to the standalone devices, I currently have a branch which has turned these into a single binary executable and you can specify multiple devices within the same process via the config file. It needs some tidying up but I hope to submit the patch in the near future. Jon _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
