Hi Mikko, [email protected] said: > Hello, > > the attached patches for RPM packaging (tested on CentOS 5) for zeromq > library are submitted under MIT license. In case the attachments get > lost they are available here as well: > > http://valokuva.org/~mikko/0001-Import-redhat-packaging.patch > http://valokuva.org/~mikko/0002-dist-hook-for-copying-zeromq.spec-to-top-level.patch > > rpmlint output: > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > Comments?
Looks good. A couple of things before I commit this: 1) Can we use the same description texts as we already have for the Debian packages? You can find these in debian/control in Git. I'd take the first line as the Summary: field in the RPM spec, and the rest of the text as the %description. 2) We don't want to package the the perf tests right now. Instead, the utils package should contain the devices binaries and their documentation. 3) I'm not sure about RPM conventions, but for Debian we have: libzmq0 : Shared library only plus general documentation (applications would depend on this) libzmq-dev : Development libraries, headers plus all API man pages libzmq-dbg : Debugging symbols for development libraries zeromq-bin : Devices and their man pages AFAICS these correspond to zeromq, zeromq-devel and zeromq-utils on RPM systems, right? (There being no equivalent to -dbg) Cheers, -mato _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
