Stuart Halloway wrote: > That sound reasonable, but I don't think it is the case here. I > bumped up the sleeps, and add printlns and flushes. What I am seeing > (with the latency test) is that the error happens before local_lat > even gets to the sleeping part. > > Again, the fishy thing is GC. As soon as GC happens on the local_lat > side, boom!
Pretty weird... something bad is definitely happening. Any more clues? Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
