On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Peter Alexander <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Peter Alexander <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Holger Hoffstaette >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:08:13 -0500, Brian Granger wrote: >>> >>>> The current load balancing algorithm used by the XREQ socket is defined in >>>> lb.cpp. Requests are simply round robin'ed through the active pipes: >>>> [snip] >>>> I am wondering if we can do better than this. My idea is to pick a client >>>> at random, rather that walking through them sequentially. > > Selection of LB algorithm should be optional to the user depending on > their particular use-case.
Yes, I think that makes sense. > I don't know the difficulties in implementing this at this point, but > I wonder if you all think it as worthy of consideration as I do. I do! Cheers, Brian > Peter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > -- Brian E. Granger, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Physics Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo [email protected] [email protected] _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
